Melody
Apr 23rd 2010, 03:50 PM
Although this study was done on furry animals, I'm putting it here because it's further proof of my (& others) constant beef that over-processed commercial foods are synthetic dust.
We can't do much for solid comparison based on the specific impact with fish, but it's obvious that it would have some similar overall effects as a comparable diet in any living creature, such as shortening the lifespan. By guesstimate based on dogs, the lifespan would be shortened by 20-25%. That's quite a difference. It could also theoretically shorten the breeding span.
Some of this may be countered by the fact that many hobbyists supplement the diet with whole foods, be they fresh, frozen or freeze-dried. Comparative growth rate studies are often done on fish, but usually on fish intended for human consumption. Lifespan isn't a focus. It would be interesting to do some informal studies of our own.:yes:
Junk Food Killing Cats & Dogs (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gZYXfu-3hSiYwROndshYaYKk7JEA)
We can't do much for solid comparison based on the specific impact with fish, but it's obvious that it would have some similar overall effects as a comparable diet in any living creature, such as shortening the lifespan. By guesstimate based on dogs, the lifespan would be shortened by 20-25%. That's quite a difference. It could also theoretically shorten the breeding span.
Some of this may be countered by the fact that many hobbyists supplement the diet with whole foods, be they fresh, frozen or freeze-dried. Comparative growth rate studies are often done on fish, but usually on fish intended for human consumption. Lifespan isn't a focus. It would be interesting to do some informal studies of our own.:yes:
Junk Food Killing Cats & Dogs (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gZYXfu-3hSiYwROndshYaYKk7JEA)